New Meta Share Class Created to Shield Zuckerberg's Voting Control From Tax Proposal
Meta's board has approved a new type of stock that would allow the CEO to settle a potential state tax bill without giving up his authority over company decisions.
By Valentina Cruz ·

An estimated $11 billion is the potential price tag facing Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg if a controversial California ballot measure passes, but the company has unveiled a financial structure designed to cover that cost without costing him control of the firm. During a recent earnings call, Meta disclosed that its board has approved the creation of Class C common stock, a new category of equity that is set to take effect in January. The company states that this issuance is intended to raise capital for employee compensation and acquisitions, including its push into artificial intelligence. However, reports indicate that the move also serves as a strategic shield against Proposition 40, a proposed one-time 5% wealth tax on the net worth of several hundred California billionaires.
The proposed tax measure, drafted by Berkeley tax law professors and sponsored by the largest healthcare union in the state, SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, could generate as much as $100 billion over five years if approved by voters. The bulk of those funds would be directed toward healthcare needs, with the remainder allocated to food assistance and education. Prop 40 has drawn sharp criticism from prominent figures in Silicon Valley, including Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who has campaigned aggressively against it and spent significant sums to defeat the measure. Critics of the proposal argue that it amounts to economic suicide for the state and will trigger capital flight.
According to reports, the new stock class was developed specifically to address the tax issue. Documents filed with the SEC outline the creation of Class C shares, which carry ownership stakes but no voting rights. As a one-time stock dividend, shareholders will receive one Class C share for every Class A or Class B share they currently hold. Meta describes this as a two-for-one stock split and emphasizes that the dividend will not change the voting power of any shareholder. Because the new shares lack votes, selling them does not reduce the holder's influence over company decisions. Meta referred inquiries regarding the matter to its earnings press release, which stated that the special committee affirmed the importance of Zuckerberg continuing to lead the company from California.
According to the filing, the dividend would allow Zuckerberg to sell or transfer up to 20% of the Class C shares he receives. This represents 10% of his overall economic stake in the company and can be done for any reason, including to cover a potential tax liability under Proposition 40 if it is enacted. Reports suggest that discussions regarding the billionaire tax began as far back as July, with conversations involving board members occurring throughout that month and August. The filing also documents concerns regarding Prop 40 and how they influenced the discussions that led to the creation of the new stock class.
Reports indicate that in September, Zuckerberg told board members he would list his Palo Alto property for sale if they could not reach an agreement to protect him from the tax, a move that could have triggered a media firestorm. Not long afterward, the stock plan was developed. The filing states that the dividend allows him to sell shares to pay any potential tax liability without affecting his majority voting control. Because the dividend is issued one-for-one, half of his post-dividend shares will be Class C, so the 20% cap equals 10% of his total economic stake.
Prop 40 remains a subject of intense debate among business leaders. Critics, including Sergey Brin, have spent money campaigning against the measure, claiming it represents economic suicide for California and will cause capital flight from the state. However, the strategy devised by Meta indicates that major companies and their leaders have creative ways of addressing the tax should it materialize. After news of Meta's strategy spread online, Democratic U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, a vocal proponent of the tax, wrote on X, "Looks like billionaires will stay and figure out a way to pay the tax."
Source: TechCrunch





